Wie kann ich das machen?
Talk:Edit Review Improvements/New filters for edit review
Return to "Edit Review Improvements/New filters for edit review" page.
Reply to "Änderungen durch einen bestimmten Bot von der Beobachtungsliste nehmen"
Reply to "Kolejka oczekujących"
Reply to "Latest revision filter improvement idea"
Reply to "The Filter "Logged Actions" needs better granularity"
Reply to "*Exclude* redirects."
Reply to "Is there a way to block out user creation logs?"
Reply to "The "highlight result" option in filters doesn't work well in dark mode"
About this board
This page is about New Filters for Edit Review filtering tools and interface. These are now standard on Recent Changes and the Watchlist.
New filters for edit review are in maintenance mode. Major bugs will be fixed but no improvements are scheduled for now.
Leave feedback in any language.
How to provide feedback
- Do you have that bug when you are not logged-in?
- Explain how to reproduce the bug (step by step)
- Tell us what is your configuration (browser version, scripts you use, etc.)
- Say on what page it is happening (Recent Changes, Watchlist, etc.)
Also see the FAQ.
Want to opt-out?
Check on your preferences on the wikis you are active on:
|Edit Review Improvements (ERI)|
Änderungen durch einen bestimmten Bot von der Beobachtungsliste nehmen
[übersetzt mit einer Übersetzungsmaschine]
Im Moment ist es nicht möglich, Bearbeitungen zu filtern, die von einem bestimmten Konto (Benutzer oder Bot) oder von einer bestimmten IP vorgenommen wurden.
At the moment, it is not possible to filter edits done by a specific account (user or bot), or by a given IP.
Kolejka stron oczekujących na przejrzenie z 3 ostatnich dni przekracza 500 . Nie widać tych starszych.
There is a technical limitation: the system will show 500 edits maximum. Or will show all edits done during the 3 days, if there is fewer than 500 edits.
(Automated translation: Istnieje ograniczenie techniczne: system wyświetli maksymalnie 500 wydań. Lub pokaże wszystkie zmiany dokonane w ciągu 3 dni, jeśli jest mniej niż 500 zmian.)
Latest revision filter improvement idea
I think that it would be useful if the latest revision filter also showed revisions that would be the latest if it didn't count edits from the same user as being the latest revision. The point would be so that vandals couldn't make a random useful edit to make it harder for people to find their vandalism.
Painful to style via MediaWiki:Common/SkinName.css
This widget, like others implemented with OOUI, is painful to style for wiki admins who maintain a custom theme but only have interface admin access. As far as I understand, the "correct" method for styling OOUI is described in OOUI/Themes and would require access to the server.
I think you would have better chances to have a reply if posting on the OOUI talk page.
Thanks for pointing me to the right direction. I'll give it a go.
The Filter "Logged Actions" needs better granularity
The Filter "Logged Actions" needs better granularity / subpoints: 1) user creation log 2) block log 3) all the rest. So that I can disable 1) and/or 2) with 3) still being displayed. ~~~~
It seems that Special:Log covers these needs.
Filter for page deletions?
Is there a way to see only pages that have been deleted?
The Logged actions filter will show you deletions and more.
Is there a way to block out user creation logs?
If there is, how do you use it, and if there is not one yet, I think it would be useful and should be around.
Help:New filters for edit review may help you.
https://abj.miraheze.org/w/api.php?action=help&modules=feedrecentchanges is also helpless against User creation logs. Jidanni (talk) 11:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
What's precisely the problem?
Impressively SUCKY "diff" tools
Unintuitive in the extreme
No idea how the filters are supposed to work
Changes page shows a mass of changes that are unlinked to -- no idea what they even refer to
Being rude won't help there.
The "highlight result" option in filters doesn't work well in dark mode
The highlighted row gets really bright and you can barely read it.
An example on the runescape wiki with settings (make sure that you are in dark mode)
This sounds like a problem with "dark mode". That seems to be a local hack feature on top of the Vector skin. Do you know who supports it?
I'm not so sure. I only know that it was implemented 31 October 2018. Is it created by someone on the wiki I'm editing on?
Possibly? It's certainly not a normal part of the Vector skin, sorry.