Project:Requests for permissions/User rights/Atcovi2

Atcovi

Requested user-rights: Administrator.

Atcovi (talk • contribs • logs • rights • global account)

Hi, it's me again. Whenever I look to requesting a special right such as sysop, I look at my declaration: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Atcovi/Sysop-declaration This requests, in my opinion, meets up with this declaration. I'm requesting sysopship so I can assist in the battle against vandalism and spam. I requested sysopship: Project:Requests/User rights/Atcovi and the reason that didn't succeed is because I wasn't active. I've been active for a little bit over than a month reverting vandalism and tagging pages for deletion here at mediawiki (Last 50 edits span from November to December, last request was from January to deep in last year). Now that I'm active, I'm genuinely asking for this right so I can protect pages when needed (Sandbox talk page/Help talk:Formatting, these are instances where I could've protected these pages from constant reverting which is a pain to do), delete pages when needed (LTAs/cross wiki spam), and block users who are disruptive (spambots). Thanks. ---Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 01:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone please have a comment on this? --Nemo 11:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted User. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 09:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Active and trusted. Would make full use of the tools. Jianhui67 (talk) 11:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Special:DeletedContributions/Atcovi looks fine; interaction with users here and elsewhere seems ok, just some minor disagreements on specific (old) actions; logs look clean; q:Wikiquote:Requests for adminship/Atcovi and v:Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship/Atcovi4 are unremarkable; less than 300 edits here and about 50 in two months, but we don't have an editing activity requirement; I think we don't block ordinary IPs for 1 year here, but he can probably follow the local custom. I can close this in a couple days if there are no new comments. Nemo 21:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. You have tagged 17 pages for deletion (one of them in December, 8 of them in January and 8 of them in February (two of them today). You also hid one comment in January and 6 in February (you hid 2 topics as well)) and made 21 non-deleted edits since you have opened this request (+50 days). You were mainly active for a few days in November and December (before opening this request) and you haven't been really active here since then. Considering your last request was declined because you got inactive, could you please be actually active for some time? Matiia (talk) 18:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've personally tried to keep a somewhat good level of activity (with the deletion requests and hiding topics and messages). If I am granted sysop, or denied and I become inactive, then you can assure I will meet my declaration and ask for a resignation/not request again. ---Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nemo, is there a final verdict here? Thanks. -Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe another bureaucrat could close this request? Krenair? MZMcBride? -Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Krenair ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:38, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user is requesting removal of these rights now. ☠MarkAHershberger☢(talk)☣ 15:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recant my request for removal. I've returned to normal activity. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 13:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]