User talk:Jeffwang/Flow

Prefer not to use LiquidThreads? Edit via here!

---

Extension:PUG

Hi Jeff. PUG should probably have a place here on mw.org, however given that it's not an extension it doesn't belong in the extension namespace. Could you try and find it a home elsewhere? Thanks Johnduhart 02:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Snippets seems like the perfect place. Johnduhart 02:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes. Johnduhart 02:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

ReassignEdits

Hey Jeff. Please do not add LQT to talk pages of my extensions, I removed it before and now again. I've replied you on Extension talk:ReassignEdits. Cheers, SVG 07:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

---

<?LiquidThreads<begin>

---

Previous page history was archived for backup purposes at User talk:Jeffwang/LQT Archive 1 on 2015-07-10.

Are you still maintaining this extension? The release date of 05 April 2012 has already passed.

Hello, are you sure that it's a good idea for you to mark as "quality version" for the first time revisions of pages on topics like this? Did you actually review the whole page and do you have knowledge on the topic to evaluate it?

I see that you checked this revision of Manual:$wgServer so I am letting you know that I will be reverting that edit. Please be more careful when you review edits. If you think that edit should stand at least use a spell checker before you revert me.

...wow...

The reason I created that page with the same content as Help:Extension:ParserFunctions was to show the result of #ifeq-ing two templates with the same content but different titles in my new revision which is pending as of 00:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC):

{{#ifeq: {{Help:Extension:ParserFunctions/identTest1}} | {{Help:Extension:ParserFunctions/identTest2}} | equal | not equal}} → not equal (although the content of Help:Extension:ParserFunctions/identTest1 is <strong> <math>8+3</math> <nowiki>Identical test...

</nowiki> and the content of Help:Extension:ParserFunctions/identTest2 is <strong> <math>8+3</math> <nowiki>Identical test... </nowiki>) Think again about speedy deletion for this.

See here why I used syntaxhighlight instead of source.