Template talk:MediaWikiHook

Labelling old code review system explicitly as legacy?

If people specify a SVN rev, we give readers a gnomicly-titled "codereview" link that used to dump them on a confusing on-wiki special page with little context, but now dumps them on a static HTML archive of what those pages used to say with absolutely none. Should we flag in-line that this is a legacy system? (Prompted by an internal staff conversation, but flagging here for discussion.) Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 14:47, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Seems reasonable to me. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 16:46, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This makes sense to me, but I also wouldn't want to add too much more complexity to these links. I think even if the link text just said "codereview archive" instead of "codereview", that could be a strong enough indicator that the link doesn't go to a currently-used code review platform. TBurmeister (WMF) (talk) 14:57, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

How's this change? Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 15:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

LGTM! TBurmeister (WMF) (talk) 15:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)