Core Platform Team/Initiatives/Eliminate Node 6
This page is obsolete. It is being retained for archival purposes. It may document extensions or features that are obsolete and/or no longer supported. Do not rely on the information here being up-to-date. The Core Platform Team and its initiatives do not exist anymore. See MediaWiki Engineering Group instead since 2023. |
Eliminate Node 6
|
Initiative Vision
This page is obsolete. It is being retained for archival purposes. It may document extensions or features that are obsolete and/or no longer supported. Do not rely on the information here being up-to-date. The Core Platform Team and its initiatives do not exist anymore. See MediaWiki Engineering Group instead since 2023. |
Vision:
| ||||
Stakeholder(s):
|
Problem:
|
Solution:
|
Aligned Goals:
|
Initiative Description
This page is obsolete. It is being retained for archival purposes. It may document extensions or features that are obsolete and/or no longer supported. Do not rely on the information here being up-to-date. The Core Platform Team and its initiatives do not exist anymore. See MediaWiki Engineering Group instead since 2023. |
- Summary
All service need to be migrated to node 10 and node 6 eliminated from production
- Significance and Motivation
Node 6 is EOL, so it's not supported and not even receiving security updates. Running outdates software is not secure.
- Outcomes
Node 6 is removed from the cluster
- Baseline Metrics
RESTBase, Kartotherian/Tilerator, Graphoid and possibly small others run node 6
- Target Metrics
Nothing runs node 6, node 6 is uninstalled
- Stakeholders
Platform Engineering, Reading Infrastructure, SRE
- Known Dependencies/Blockers
None given
Time and Resource Estimates
This page is obsolete. It is being retained for archival purposes. It may document extensions or features that are obsolete and/or no longer supported. Do not rely on the information here being up-to-date. The Core Platform Team and its initiatives do not exist anymore. See MediaWiki Engineering Group instead since 2023. |
- Estimated Start Date
None given
- Actual Start Date
None given
- Estimated Completion Date
None given
- Actual Completion Date
None given
- Resource Estimates
1 sprint 1 ENG/1 SRE
- Collaborators
None given
Subpages
50% done
Poll
Team members are invited to voice support or opposition, and give their reasoning. Please use the polling templates, for example:
* {{support}} I like this example! ~~~~
* {{weak oppose}} This is not a great example example... ~~~~
- Support Removing dependencies on outdated platforms is always a good thing. DKinzler (WMF) (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Upgrading versions to remove security vulnerabilities sounds like not only a good idea but very necessary! NNikkhoui (WMF)
- Support 50% Done, plus what Nikki and Daniel said AMooney (WMF)
- Support Strongly support. If it were possible to go ahead and decommission anything currently using Node 6 rather than moving it to Node 10, even better. BPirkle (WMF)
- Support Agreed removing outdated software is important. CCicalese (WMF) (talk) 19:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Support for the above reasons. NNzali (WMF)
- Support Since Node 6 is no longer receiving security updates I agree removing it should should be a priority. CAndrew (WMF) (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Support for reasons above. WDoran (WMF)