Tgr (WMF)

Tgr (WMF)

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Tgr (WMF)/Archive 1 on 1 October 2015.

ik kan het even niet plaatsen

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Ik ben bereid om mee te werken maar op dit moment weet ik niet waar te beginnen Buitenisbinnen (talk) 23:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please provide feedback on suggested improvements to the Code of Conduct

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Thanks to everyone who’s helped work on the Code of Conduct so far.

People have brought up issues they feel were missed when working on "Unacceptable behavior" and "Report a problem". Consultants have also suggested changes in these same sections.

These are important sections, so please take a look at the proposed changes. I apologize that this feedback arrived later than planned, but I think this will create a better document.

If you prefer to give your opinion privately, feedback via e-mail is welcome at conduct-discussionwikimedia.org.

Thanks. Mattflaschen-WMF via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Accidental rollback

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Looks like I just accidentally pushed the rollback link from Special:Recentchanges, my apologies - self-reverted. Eloquence (talk) 04:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please participate in discussion on updated "Marginalized and underrepresented groups" text

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Thanks for participating in the earlier discussion on Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Marginalized and underrepresented groups. There was some support and some issues were raised. I've attempted to propose a better draft to address the issues.

Please participate at Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#New proposed wording. Thanks. User:Mattflaschen-WMF via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please participate in discussion on updated "Enforcement issues" text

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Thanks for participating in the earlier discussion on Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Enforcement issues. There was strong support for the first two points, so they have been closed. Most people either supported the third at least in principle, or were neutral. However, there are some suggested wording changes (partly by Smalyshev (WMF), and partly by me).

Please participate again at Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#New proposed wording. Thanks. User:Mattflaschen-WMF via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please participate in discussion on updated "Enforcement issues" text

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Sorry, the correct link for the discussion about wording re Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Enforcement issues is Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Circumvention text new wording. Thanks. I apologize for the double-message. User:Mattflaschen-WMF via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Manual:Bot passwords

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Heiya Tgr, I have just set up the respective docu pages $wgEnableBotPasswords, $wgBotPasswordsCluster, $wgBotPasswordsDatabase. It will be nice if you could have a peep at it, especially the "example" for the password cluster ... Thanks and cheers --[[kgh]] (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

OAuth for pywikibot

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi! First of all thanks for the new tutorial Manual:Pywikibot/OAuth/Wikimedia. However, since the bot edits must be performed with the bot account, it is not completely clear if the bot operator should fill the OAuth form while logged on mediawiki.org with his main account or with the bot account. Moreover few details about the RSA key would be useful. (can I use it with Pywikibot? Should I use it? Is it mandatory? How can I use it?) -- Basilicofresco (talk) 03:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

You need to fill the form with whichever account you want to give the bot access to. (So probably the bot account, although I'm not sure how much sense it makes with OAuth to have a separate personal and bot account. cf. phab:T142303)

As far as I know Pywikibot does not support the RSA signature method for OAuth, and in any case it's complicated (you have to know how to generate an RSA key, for starters), which is why it is left out of the tutorial. Tgr (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please participate again in improving the "Conflict of interest" section

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The "Conflict of interest" section was not approved earlier.

There has been further discussion on it, aiming to solve those issues. Please participate in the sub-sections of Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Finalize "Conflict of interest" section? and make sure your concerns are being addressed.

Thanks.

User:Mattflaschen-WMF 03:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Weigh in on whether to finalize the new version of the "Conflict of interest" section

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

You participated earlier in discussion about the "Conflict of interest" section of the draft Code of Conduct for technical spaces. There was not consensus to approve an earlier version of this section. I'm contacting you to let you know the draft has been updated, and we are now discussing whether to finalize the new version.

Please participate here.

Thank you,

User:Mattflaschen-WMF via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Test

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Test?

Test! TgrTest (talk) 19:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Page moves on renames

Hi Tgr. Hope that you're doing okay. I was wondering if do you think https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/372803/ is now ready? Regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

The patch looks fine, I just want to test it locally before merging. Sorry for not having gotten around to do that; it has been on my todo list for a long time but I always had something more urgent. I'll try to merge it this week (no promises, this is conferences week for the WMF). Tgr (WMF) (talk) 18:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

On a closer look, The exception handling shouldn't be done that way. Tgr (WMF) (talk) 18:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Hopefully @Melos can take care of fixing the issue :) Thanks for your time. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:37, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

I've uploaded another patch could you take a look now please? Melos (talk) 19:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

T64266

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi Tgr, I added a comment to T64266 about the problem with the MultimediaViewer (a suggestion about a simple solution for the problem). Is there anybody left after all this time (2014) to take care of this problem? Regards, Wilrooij ~ Wilrooij (talk) 14:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Changing the behavior is not technically complicated, there was just no consensus on whether that's a good idea. Anyway MediaViewer is maintained by the Multimedia team and I haven't been a member for a couple years now. The product manager for Multimedia is Ramsey Isler so he is probably the best person to talk to about this. Tgr (WMF) (talk) 05:32, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello Tgr, thank you, for your information. I will contact him. Wilrooij (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Casing in abstract schemas

Hey, I just saw Special:Diff/3858844, The code I wrote would very likely explode majestically if we use "notnull" instead of "NotNull". Where did you see the DBAL docs? I can work on it and fix it though, not too complicated. Ladsgroup (talk) 10:38, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I assumed it's case insensitive because both the page and your patches already had mixed case (`Notnull` and `NotNull`).

The docs I mentioned are https://github.com/doctrine/dbal/blob/2.10.x/docs/en/reference/schema-representation.rst Tgr (WMF) (talk) 10:48, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

It can still work fine with both and I don't mind lower case either. It's that setOption in Column.php is like this: https://github.com/doctrine/dbal/blob/2.10.x/lib/Doctrine/DBAL/Schema/Column.php#L75 so I assume "setnotnull" wouldn't work. I dig deeper and let you know. Ladsgroup (talk) 10:56, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

hmm, it's because php function calls are case insensitive: https://stackoverflow.com/a/5643544/2596051 so it doesn't matter which way. There's pros and cons:

- "NotNull" is closer to the actual declaration

- "notnull" is easier to read, looks better IMO.

I don't know which way to go TBH. Ladsgroup (talk) 09:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Given the docs, I would say latter. Let's go with the latter. Ladsgroup (talk) 09:43, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

On TDF

... I think the TDF has failed to keep decision processes aligned with core open-source values such as transparency of the decisionmaking process (if that was even a goal), which is maybe OK for decisions which primarily affect the Wikimedia infrastructure, but I don't think its acceptable for decisions with a large impact on the entire MediaWiki user and developer community. ...

Hear hear. Izno (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

ExternalStorage and content_address

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi! I was documenting the change in phab:T362566 on the Manual:Content table, but I was surprised to see in Manual:External storage it was supposed to be working since 1.32, according to your edit. However, the linked task implies it will be implemented on 1.43, and looking at my tables on 1.39 I can only see tt: addresses in the content table (I have External Storage enabled and working).

How could this be possible? Maybe it was reverted, or the change lost somehow? Or am I interpreting the code change wrong? Ciencia Al Poder (talk) 23:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

I might have misremembered or misunderstood. The new tables were definitely added in 1.32 with the intention of abstracting away the storage and allowing ES (or whatever), but maybe support for that wasn't fully implemented. @DKinzler (WMF) might be a better person to ask. Tgr (WMF) (talk) 19:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

The storage schema was designed with this use case in mind, and we planned to implement it in 1.32cor 1.33. But at the time we didn't get resourcing for going forward with the final phase of the migration. There were also some unresolved questions around handling legacy character encodings, which has since been fixed.

Because of that, we kept using the "tt" schema for blob storage. I'm happy to see that Amir picked up the last stage of migration now. DKinzler (WMF) (talk) 07:18, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation! Ciencia Al Poder (talk) 09:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.