Test of LQT

edit

Test of LQT, since on my MW1.166 it doesn't work. :-( 84.169.22.93 09:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

And where is that site, why not create an account and tell us on your userpage?

11:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Bugzilla move to archives

edit

Hi Myrtone,

you moved the content of https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Bugzilla to a page called "achrive 1". Apart from the misspelling I don't understand the reasoning behind. "Clearing discussion for liquid threads" does not tell me much, and I'd prefer to revert this currently - it didn't feel that crowded yet to deserve making people click one more time. What do you think? AKlapper (WMF) (talk) 14:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about the typo and thanks for fixing it, some others have done similar archivals. I thought there was a move to adopt liquid threads across all talkpages here. There had been no comments on that page since last year, and that talkpage had not yet been liquified. But because there was already discussion on that page, I thought it needed to go somewhere in order for liquid threads to be added. Fact is that liquid threads is a far superior discussion system to what is found on most talkpages on most wikis, though many still have a hard time accepting this.

14:22, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

I prefer to not use LQT on the Bugzilla talk page as LQT is unmaintained code (and will be superseded by Flow) - hence I do not want to extend its use and I do not want to use LQT for the Bugzilla Talk page. I did not fix the typo either as I likely do not have rights on mediawiki.org to move pages, sorry. I'd appreciate if you could revert your changes. AKlapper (WMF) (talk) 14:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
I don't know what an "unmaintained" code is. Although LQT is an unmaintained code, it is already in use on many other talkpages, what's so special about the Bugzilla talkpage? And Jdforrester, who help found wikipedia's arbitration committee, has already fixed the typo. 23:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Unmaintained means that basically nobody works anymore on the LQT codebase in order to fix problems. There are some drive-by fixes by volunteers, but in general it is a codebase that nobody recommends to install on any new wikis. This is also written at the top of https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:LiquidThreads . There is nothing special about the Bugzilla talkpage, it's just that I maintain Bugzilla and hence care about anything Bugzilla-related. :) I don't understand why it's a good argument to say that LQT is already used on many other talkpages if it's also NOT used on many wikipages and talkpages... It probably boils down to the question "who decides what's good" (I for myself don't know if there's any process for this in place), and I prefer to not have to deal with LQT and its many issues and shortcomings. One funny thing for example is that the link that I get as the notification email for your latest comment is http://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Myrtone&offset=20130911233218&lqt_mustshow=33034#Talk:Bugzilla_move_to_archives_33034 which showed an old revision of your userpage for me which does not even show our recent conversion here, due to LQT. AKlapper (WMF) (talk) 00:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
I get similar links in my email notification but it did not encounter that problem.

00:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Alright, but that was only one example. Now could you revert using LQT please for that page? AKlapper (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
I'm not an administrator, and I don't belive that one has to be an administrator to revert such a thing, just note that this wiki is not compulsory, almost every contributor on nearly every wiki, and nearly every forum poster is only a volunteer. If consensus is to revert using liquid threads, one can just remove {{#useliquidthreads:1}} and revert the pagemove.

11:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Alright, thanks! AKlapper (WMF) (talk) 11:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Test of parser fuctions

edit

I tried to incorperate the parser function into my welcome template, but they didn't work, at least when I tried to substitute it.

01:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)