I was wondering how this edit got through filter 57, but I am guessing that reverting an edit is not one of the editing actions that the abuse filter tracks--is that the case? If so, is it possible to include revert?
Topic on Extension talk:AbuseFilter/Rules format
It has nothing to do with reverts. The edit didn't trigger the filter because the filter only applies to root user pages, not user subpages.
Ah, thank you---I missed the "/"! :)