Topic on Help talk:Structured Discussions/Flow

Considering "upvote" utility

3
BillyJSimsIII (talkcontribs)

Up-votes! - While I love the utility of having chronologically organized posts, and appreciate how this aids in understanding the progression of discussion, I wonder about adding upvotes - possibly under an alternate, toggle-able discussion view mode.

advocating points:

-empower users to raise awareness of a particular comment/idea. This may be significantly more valuable in a wiki with "numerous" (to a human, "innumerable") pages/topics, and with frequent posts, allowing for something like a collective attention span.

-encourage users to collectively revisit a subject. i.e. posts may become relevant/reviewed as needed, despite chronology.

-encourage more user engagement and curatorial responsibility. Many wikis are reference-based and function as a communal utility. Some, however, may have a more active, research-based, or otherwise participative orientation. Upvotes would be extremely helpful for these wikis to self-organize attention outside of the structure of the site (pages, topical division, etc)

concerns:

-corrupting a relatively pure-to-concept discussion forum with metrics of personal value - (likes, reposts, upvotes)


Curious as to people's thoughts on this!

Aron Manning (talkcontribs)
Trizek (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Structured discussions are not under development anymore. There is a new project, the Talk pages project, where you should post your ideas!

Reply to "Considering "upvote" utility"