Talk:LiquidThreads 3.0
Latest comment: 12 years ago by DaSch in topic Further Development
See also Extension talk:LiquidThreads.
Archives
|
---|
Archive 1 |
It's dead!
editFinally no development on this. Starting a new Version and then killing the Extension totalty. Nice work! --DaSch (talk) 13:32, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
....--Shizhao (talk) 09:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- According to the Roadmap, the rewrite will be re-energized on July 2012. Helder 18:25, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keeping my fingers crossed. Still it appears to be way too early to start holding our breath. ;) Renaming it? Why? There is no reason to rename your "child" even if it is technically challenged right now. How cruel and unusual. Cheers --[[kgh]] (talk) 18:30, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- It's very common to change name to products or companies with bad press. Assuming you're actually changing something substantial, it's not even malicious. --Nemo 23:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- LQT as such does not have bad press at all. Here bad press relates only to the fact that its development was abandoned. Would you rename a neglected "child" after it finally had the chance to move into a children's home for a potentially better future? :D --[[kgh]] (talk) 11:11, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- So how does Flow fit into all this? --Ashimema (talk) 15:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- That's SHIT! --DaSch (talk) 12:35, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- So how does Flow fit into all this? --Ashimema (talk) 15:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keeping my fingers crossed. Still it appears to be way too early to start holding our breath. ;) Renaming it? Why? There is no reason to rename your "child" even if it is technically challenged right now. How cruel and unusual. Cheers --[[kgh]] (talk) 18:30, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Further Development
editPlease take a look here Thread:Extension talk:LiquidThreads/Development Help --DaSch (talk) 18:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)