Wikimedia Release Engineering Team/SSD Sync Up/2019-08-06

2019-08-06

edit

Last Time: 2019-07-30 Goals: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technology/Goals/2019-20_Q1#Release_Engineering

Deployment Pipeline

edit

Workboard

GOALS

edit
  • Migrate restrouter
  • (Stretch): MobileContentService
  • (Stretch): Preparatory MediaWiki config clean-up & static loading work 
    • Moving configuration to static configuration (e.g., json files rather than a bunch of PHP)

TODOs from Last Time

edit
  •  N Not done TODO Need to fix pipelinelib's base image -- make a task
  •  N Not done TODO Add a changelog/NEWS file to blubber

Other Work

edit

New CI

edit

GOALS

edit
  • POCs of GitLab, Argo, and Zuul3 systems; evaluate options
    •   Done GitLab probably done
      • ```TODO``` Lars: write up GitLab PoC evaluation
      •   Done Lars to set up meeting to discuss evaluation
          • Not done
    • Dan working on argo
      • parts of PoC working
      • worked with upstream to implement more features, this time for git artifacts (both merged but not released)
      • Moving with PoC running master
      • Argo "workflow" k8s resource that defines task to run -- source that from the target repo as a PoC
      • future work: transform .pipeline/config.yaml to workflow definition
      • Argo Events to report back to gerrit...maybe
      • Patched workflow controller instead of all components
      • Lars: Not necessary to run upstream releases for PoC
    • Brennen working on zuulv3
      •   In progress
      • (Still) Highly dependent on train
      • James: is there an update about how easy it would be to migrate existing zuulv2 work to zuulv3?
      • Brennen: my sense is a lot of work but doable (based on talking to Antoine) -- I have a feeling that it is a good deal less work than migrating to another system
      • James: is the zuul migration like one we would end up building from scratch? Aka are we stacking the deck in favour of zuulv3 against argo and GitLab by doing this?
      • Tyler: We're likely to build with nodepool using a static driver to map to the current jenkins agents; if we were doing it "properly" it'd be based on k8s/whatever.
      • Dan: we should consider how difficult it is to migrate specific jobs in the evaluation
      • Brennen: Worth trying k8s with zuul / nodepool?
      • Lars: Pipelinelib written in groovy cannot be used outside of jenkins, so we should consider how difficult this will be to migrate
      • James: We have 423 JJB jobs + 8500+ of lines of layout for ~1400 specific repos -- although they're maybe not "good" -- migration is a chance to fix things
      • Dan: if pipelinelib were the new way to do things, we should evaluate how easy that is to implement in the different systems
  • Document an implementable architecture for what we want in new CI
    • Lars: Will have new version hopefully for Thursday (didn't, still working on this)

TODOs from Last Time

edit

Other Work

edit

Local Development

edit

GOALS

edit

TODOs from Last Time

edit

Other Work

edit
    •   In progress Restbase
  • Local Dev CLI
    • Mukunda has updated patchset
    • Refactoring -- expect patchset update later today