Wikimedia Apps/Team/Retrospectives/2016-11-03
iOS
editNovember 03, 2016
Previous Retrospective Actions
edit-
Discussion Topics
edit- MB: Ran a qualitative survey on iOS
- Sent to those on the outskirts of the team
- Purpose was to get a better sense of where the team is at with process and measuring success, by getting open feedback and coding themes
- Clear and aligned goals
- Team is quick to respond
- Mailing list helpful
- Face to face chats
- Team is friendly
- (When in doubt) trusts the team’s judgement
Questions
edit- MB: How was it without TPG around?
- Hope to better define engagement
- Reporting action items and followup
- Maybe fewer, but feels more like we didn’t have a recorder/motivator
- +1 Corey: having max around frees us up to have the conversations because we have a safety net
- Josh: good to have someone who is not part of the conversation, focus on logistics
- Josh: might be like mental health prescription: what happens when you stop taking your medicine?
- MB: Are we getting anything out of Combined Apps Standup?
- Can go a long time without being useful, but then the rare occurrence it’s really handy
- Corey: if there is a rare occurrence, might as well have a formal adhoc meeting
- Cultural impact is good, reminded that we have compatriots
- There used to be a monthly staff meeting for Reading. What happened to it?
- We used to do ALL meetings together; we brought this one back, and it’s not really hurting us
- Josh: if the services team becomes it’s own team, we might get tech leads together
- Can go a long time without being useful, but then the rare occurrence it’s really handy