Topic on Talk:ResourceLoader

Never mind, I will try it out myself later. I just asked thinking someone who has already tried it could respond with yes/no.

For curiousity, do custom CSS and JavaScript run while an account is blocked?

If so, it could cause a user to be unable to turn off their custom code if they want to, since they are unable to edit it.

Basically, the code can be accessed and executed by any www user around the world.

However, the code is not “running” if an account is not permitted to log in or to edit, since the automatic execution is bound to login.

Turning off is not necessary as long nobody is starting the code, and this needs some kind of explicit transclusion if not per default after login for this account.

Thanks for response.

Basically, the code can be accessed and executed by any www user around the world.

An on-site block can obviously not affect CSS and JS code that is run using other tools such a browser extension, but I was referring to the custom CSS and JS pages that users can have in their user space (e.g. User:Example/common.js), which allows users to enter custom code that runs upon each page load.

However, the code is not “running” if an account is not permitted to log in or to edit, since the automatic execution is bound to login.

An ordinary block does not affect users' ability to log in, it simply disables editing. I presume it also disables the editing of custom CSS and JS pages that the user has in their user space.

But does a block prevent the existing code in user space from being run?

The code is still there, and if a blocked person is still permitted to log in and will personally execute any JS/CSS they want they are able to do so. There are no means to prevent this, and the code may be copied and executed via en:Greasemonkey or browser JS/config. However, it does no harm to the world around. Who cares?

If there are dangerous things implemented which might e.g. endanger privacy of other people invited to run this code, or manipulate their edits, every sysop is permitted to delete such code immediately without further JS/CSS permissions.

The code is still there, and if a blocked person is still permitted to log in and will personally execute any JS/CSS they want they are able to do so.

Sorry, apparently I didn't word my question well enough. When "User:Example" is logged in, will MediaWiki automatically run "User:Example/common.js" in the browser of "User:Example" while the account "User:Example" is blocked?

I could test it myself, but I have no access to a MediaWiki server at my current location and didn't want to bother setting one up just to test this.