Topic on Talk:New requirements for user signatures/Help

2001:984:F34D:1:1C80:96EB:5362:FC76 (talkcontribs)

Why can i not just edit the source and have to use some hair brained tool? And don't force users to change their signature: just support it. Don't pay some evil marketing agency for some stupid rebranding and spend the money on something usefu

2001:984:F34D:1:1C80:96EB:5362:FC76 (talkcontribs)

l like developers. and why the f could i not complete that comment?

2001:984:F34D:1:1C80:96EB:5362:FC76 (talkcontribs)

And why the f does the unified login not work? And why did it not warn me that I am editing anonymously, like all edit pages do normally?

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)
  • This community chose this style for the default page type for discussions about five years ago.
  • If you block "third-party cookies", then SUL doesn't work. The warning that you are logged out is a blue band that looks something like this image.
  • Can you think of any good reason why bad HTML (e.g., unclosed tags that change the font for the rest of the page) and violations of common policy standards (e.g., a signature with no links) should be supported in software?
Reply to "Wtf?"