Topic on Talk:Collection Extension 2/Flow

Great! What is the status?

6
Kelson (talkcontribs)

I'm really really late to read this proposal, but I want to share my opinion about it with you:

  • "Read later" seems also to me to be the best labelling in comparison to the others...
  • I fully support the new workflow, nothing against.
  • The main problem we have now, is that the tool is not prominent enough... so it has to be more prominent to be more used.
  • Epub format support seems to me to be a must "have"

What is the status of this project? Kelson (talk) 22:33, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Jwild (talkcontribs)

Hi! The status was totally stalled. No one expressed demand, and so it wasn't budgeted for or prioritized :(

He7d3r (talkcontribs)

=(

Kelson (talkcontribs)

Sad. This project is, like Wikipublish, necessary to improve or e-book generation toolchain. How much is needed for the implementation?... hope this project will not be forgotten. In any case, I won't. Kelson (talk) 08:30, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Ckepper (talkcontribs)

Maybe ePub can drive interest for this project as well (It will become available soon on Wikipedia). Personally, I would love to continue with this.

FrancoR (talkcontribs)

Hi! I usually use the collection extension, and I think it's a great solution to save/print books or single articles. The drawback is that the extension is quite difficult to configure and to mantain; for example in theese days I upgraded my MW from 1.17 to 1.19.1 and Collection from 1.5 to 1.6.1 as explained in the conllection extension page but it stop working, and nobody support it neither answers the quistions. So, having a more complete (with ebook etc) and reliable Collection 2 would be really amazing. What should we do to encourage and support the developement of this project ?

Reply to "Great! What is the status?"