Talk:VERP/LQT Archive 1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Nemo bis in topic Deadline


DeadlineEdit

Hi all. This is Tony. Should I submit the entire project schedule when I submit the proposal by March 10 ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 01tonythomas (talkcontribs

Sure, go ahead! --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 16:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
At least a stub would be advisable. --Nemo 16:29, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I will try to add a rough sketch, also, should the Mentors name be added ? I dont see any of the other templates with that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 01tonythomas (talkcontribs
As long as you have all the minimum information and you follow more or less the same structure (sections), you can add all you want. :) --Nemo 18:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Using HMACEdit

As per the current discussions (with my mentors, Chris Steipp and Bugzilla bug#46640) the decision to use HMAC is proposed. An HMAC, with a secret key, over a string containing the user's email address, timestamp, and the list name can generate the VERP address. The advantage is that php has a built in function for it-- http://us1.php.net/hash_hmac We need developer consensus on the same.

Return to "VERP/LQT Archive 1" page.