Talk:Edit check/False positives/Reports
Latest comment: 2 hours ago by Strainu in topic Strainu
Spoorthi Rao
edit- Page and diff
- Please link to the page where the check was shown, and the diff if you can. https://kn.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B2%AC%E0%B2%BF%E0%B2%97%E0%B3%8D_%E0%B2%AC%E0%B2%BE%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%8D_%E0%B2%95%E0%B2%A8%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%A8%E0%B2%A1_(%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%80%E0%B2%B8%E0%B2%A8%E0%B3%8D_11)
- Check shown
- Please list the Edit Check tags you see associated with the edit you are reporting. [1] [2]
- Description
- Please describe why you do not think Edit Check should have been activated for this edit.
Spoorthi Rao (talk) 04:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC) Above mentioned user is citing his or her personal opinion and destroying article's credibility.
- Hello @Spoorthi Rao
- Thank you for reporting this.
- After investigation, the activation of Edit check (see here how it looks) was accurate.
- It also appears that the user you mentioned would have had changed the article no matter what. When the request to add a reference was shown, the added a random website instead of declining the request.
- Hope this helps; if you have any question, let me know! Trizek_(WMF) (talk) 14:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Strainu
edit- Page and diff
- https://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Florica_Prevenda&curid=2298559&diff=16648598&oldid=15782574
- Check shown
- Edit Check (references) activated, Edit Check (referințe) respins (incert)
- Description
- The edit contains sources. Not sure if they were added after the prompt, but either way, it's confusing to have the rejected tag
Strainu (talk) 08:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Another diff, same situation. Strainu (talk) 10:59, 5 November 2024 (UTC)