This page used the Structured Discussions extension to give structured discussions. It has since been converted to wikitext, so the content and history here are only an approximation of what was actually displayed at the time these comments were made.
Welcome to the legacy Structured Discussions sandbox!
This is a wikitext export of the content that was formerly structured as Flow. Creating this was a pain due to its sheer size, and probably a waste of my time, but for completeness' sake ...
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
La visserie n'intervient qu'en bout de poutre, on peut donc utiliser des vis plus courtes que l'on insère par l'intérieur de la grande poutre
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Je viens de m’apercevoir que la visserie qu'on avait envisagée n'existe pas en standard/ Je pensais prendre du M6 mais ce boulon demande une longueur de vis de 82 mini. Le problème alors est que la poutre envisagée ne convient plus car écrou trop grands (sauf si on passe à une fixation avec un boulon mais à mon sens, c'est pas recommandé) ClemFlip (talk) 10:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
cette config de visserie n'intervient qu'en bout de poutre, on peut donc utiliser des vis plus courtes que l'on insère par l'intérieur de la grande poutre. ClemFlip (talk) 10:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, ça marche finalement. En effet essayons de n'avoir que des pièces standards.
Une autre solution aurait pu être une tige filetée serrée de chaque côté par un écrou. Je post au cas où ce problème se représenterait à un autre endroit ClemFlip (talk) 10:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Structured Discussions is following MediaWiki's software compatibility. If your browser is not on the list of the "Grade A" browsers, Structured Discussions may not work for you. In any case, having an up-to-date browser is highly recommended for safety reasons.
Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur? 91.217.196.5 (talk) 09:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I like your improvements to Kungsleden at Wikivoyage. I see that the prices are listed in Swedish kroner. It seems like it would attract a lot of non-Swedish travelers. Do you think that the prices should include a conversion to Euros or maybe US dollars? @Pashley or @Ground Zero probably know what the usual policy is; I can't remember it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
i heard name mentioned. 😀 We should just post prices in the local currency. Exchange rates for the kroner fluctuate, so putting in other currencies in each article would be adding info that will be out of date quickly. We keep exchange rates on each country's page, e.g. Sweden, in the "Buy" section. Ground Zero (talk) 14:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Non esiste un consenso unanime nello stabilire quando si possano ritenere concluse le guerre rivoluzionarie francesi e cominciate quelle riconducibili a Napoleone Bonaparte. Una data possibile di inizio di queste ultime è il 9 novembre 1799, giorno in cui Bonaparte salì al potere in Francia con il colpo di Stato del 18 brumaio. La data di inizio usata più comunemente è il 18 maggio 1803, in occasione della rinnovata dichiarazione di guerra tra Gran Bretagna e Francia, dopo le reciproche accuse di violazione degli accordi sanciti con il trattato di Amiens, evento che pose termine all'unico periodo di pace generalizzata in Europa tra il 1792 e il 1814. Un'ultima data di inizio proposta è il 2 dicembre 1804, giorno nel quale Napoleone si incoronò imperatore. Le guerre napoleoniche ebbero termine dopo la disfatta finale di Napoleone nella battaglia di Waterloo il 18 giugno 1815 e il secondo Trattato di Parigi.
Il periodo che va dal 20 aprile del 1792 al 20 novembre 1815 viene anche indicato con il termine di "grande guerra francese"
La battaglia di Lipsia (16-19 ottobre, 1813), conosciuta anche come la battaglia delle nazioni (Völkerschlacht bei Leipzig in tedesco), fu lo scontro più grande, in termini di forze impegnate e di perdite subite dalle due parti, verificatosi durante le guerre napoleoniche e una delle sconfitte decisive subite da Napoleone Bonaparte. Determinò la disfatta francese nella campagna di Germania, costrinse l'imperatore ad una difficile ritirata fino in Francia e provocò il crollo definitivo del sistema di alleanze organizzato da Napoleone in Europa. La battaglia, combattuta con grande accanimento dalle due parti, vide per la prima volta la partecipazione contemporanea sul campo della massa degli eserciti delle potenze europee continentali anti-francesi (Russia, Prussia, Austria e Svezia) ed il suo esito venne determinato soprattutto dalla netta superiorità numerica dei coalizzati. 62.110.177.36 (talk) 15:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
La battaglia di Waterloo (denominata inizialmente dai francesi battaglia di Mont Saint-Jean e dai prussiani battaglia di Belle-Alliance) si svolse il 18 giugno 1815 durante la guerra della Settima coalizione fra le truppe francesi guidate da Napoleone Bonaparte e gli eserciti britannici del Duca di Wellington e prussiano del feldmarescialloGebhard Leberecht von Blücher. Fu una delle più combattute e sanguinose battaglie delle guerre napoleoniche, nonché l'ultima battaglia di Napoleone, segnando la sua definitiva sconfitta e il conseguente esilio a Sant'Elena. La battaglia in realtà ebbe luogo nel territorio del villaggio di Mont-Saint-Jean, situato alcuni chilometri a sud della cittadina di Waterloo, nella quale si trovava il quartier generale del Duca di Wellington.
Dopo la fuga di Napoleone dall'isola d'Elba nel marzo 1815, numerosi Stati europei si unirono in un'alleanza militare dando vita alla settima coalizione, con lo scopo di sconfiggere definitivamente l'imperatore francese. Napoleone decise di attaccare di sorpresa i due eserciti che Regno Unito e Prussia avevano raggruppato in Belgio; l'imperatore sperava di raggiungere una rapida vittoria sfruttando la scarsa coesione dei suoi avversari.
Due giorni prima di Waterloo i francesi avevano sconfitto i prussiani nella battaglia di Ligny, ma Wellington, informato che Blücher era riuscito a riorganizzare il suo esercito e sembrava intenzionato a marciare in suo aiuto, prese la decisione di rischiare una battaglia contro le forze di Napoleone. Il generale britannico schierò i suoi uomini in difesa lungo la scarpata di Mont-Saint-Jean, vicino alla strada per Bruxelles, confidando nell'aiuto dei prussiani. Napoleone sferrò una serie di sanguinosi attacchi contro le linee britanniche a partire dalle ore 11:30 e nel tardo pomeriggio sembrò vicino alla vittoria, ma l'ostinata resistenza del nemico e l'arrivo in massa dei prussiani decisero alla fine la battaglia a favore dei coalizzati.
Ancora oggi nei pressi di Waterloo è ricordata la grande battaglia con una serie di monumenti, ed esiste un museo dedicato al famoso scontro. L'intera zona è un parco storico. 217.115.65.7 (talk) 15:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Was wondering if I it would be possible to link topics!
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Bla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla bla
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Bla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla bla
Bla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla bla
Bla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla blaBla bla bla
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A marginal em nosso ecossistema é importante para o avanço de inovações tecnológicas e transforma a visão de outras possibilidades com atalhos abrindo novos caminhos e melhorando o fluxo planetário. 2804:7F5:9483:A594:0:0:0:2 (talk) 07:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with MediaWiki.org. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox or the VisualEditor test page for any other tests you may want to do. If you want to contribute, please read Project:About.
Thank you for experimenting with MediaWiki.org. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox or the VisualEditor test page for any other tests you may want to do. If you want to contribute, please read Project:About.
According to WP the original song “ Born to be Wild” was written and sung by The band Stepenwolf. I don’t think that that’s true. I heard an original song from the late 1950’s. I don’t know the band’s name but all the same I was surprised that they were singing the song “Born to be Wild“. Please check this out thanks CG Osbun. C.G.Osbun (talk) 16:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Usa il modulo sottostante per inviare un messaggio email all'utente indicato. L'indirizzo specificato nelle preferenze del mittente apparirà nel campo "Da:" del messaggio per consentire al destinatario di rispondere direttamente. Phainh (talk) 22:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support this is how the template would look. Épine (talk) 08:12, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
</figure-inline> Phainh (talk) 21:56, 12 December 2020 (UTC).jpg)
Done lol