I (Matthias) took too long to start reviewing SVG patch (I was in no rush with Cormac on vacation, but only got to it once he was back already)
With the recent rash of absences, I wonder if there is a more formal way we can handle absence-related gaps in our capacity (not sure if CR was a problem, but maybe addressing serious concerns in production that arise during a vacation is not super clear)
I have no suggestions yet
Standup meetings are a chain instead of individual, so one has to accept or decline for each day rather than each recurring instance. Not a problem if you go to all standups, but folks like Scrum Masters don't because they have other friends. Suggestion: Have Eng-Admin separate the meetings into their own recurring instances, instead of 4.
On the "big picture" side, still a little confusion on the work we'll be doing in the near future on SDoC (not our fault, but something to be addressed) (curious about this too...)
Nothing yet so far
I'm a little unclear about reviews when people outside the team are involved - if I see someone else is reviewing a patch, I usually just stay out of it. Is that ok?
