Manual talk:Glossary/Flow

About this board

Pols12 (talkcontribs)

Hi @Partynia,

You had marked the page for translation, before reverting your changes. Yet, I think it would be nice to use the new Translate system for the glossary. Can you explain why you have reverted you’re preparation, please?

Reply to "Translation"

not another Glossary, meta:Glossary wins

2
SPage (WMF) (talkcontribs)

meta:Glossary is
+ bigger,
+ more comprehensive
+ translated into many more languages
- has terms that aren't technical, such as "Affiliations Committee"
+ has more technical terms that are missing here like "AbuseFilter", "Eqiad", "Varnish".

On balance this glossary should be merged with meta-wiki's Glossary and replaced with a soft redirect. I don't see any templates making reference to this. The primary linker to this is Developer hub with three links.

Samwilson (talkcontribs)

It seems that the two glossaries have different scopes: here is about the software, the one on Meta-Wiki is about the Wikimedia projects.

I've removed the merge template, as there's not been any discussion about this in the two years it's been there.

Reply to "not another Glossary, meta:Glossary wins"
There are no older topics
Return to "Glossary/Flow" page.