Manual talk:Contents

Please note we have a Project:Manual page and its associated discussion page Project talk:Manual, which are for discussing work on the manual in general. This page is for discussing just the Manual:Contents page.

Всем здравия. Подскажите пожалуйста, куда обратиться по поводу размещения города на карте мира? Меня закинули на край карты, там нет живых городов..

Hi, I'm from LiteSpeed Technologies and we have a new open-source cache plugin for MediaWiki if anyone wants to try it out. Please let me know if you are interested!

I was curious about this message. The code is on GitHub https://github.com/litespeedtech/lscache_mediawiki and see also https://www.litespeedtech.com/support/wiki/doku.php/litespeed_wiki:cache:mediawiki.

Peterblaise left some interesting notes and thoughts about a/the MediaWiki manual on the Support Desk. As there was no discussion there on this (that page is not a really convenient place for such discussions, of course), I now leave a permalink to the thread here: . 00:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

This post was posted by Myrtone, but signed as Bdk.

It seems to me that after 7 years this has become irrelevant.

we are migrating the mediawiki from 1.13 to 1.27.

as part of this we are trying to add below new enhancements as well

1) Open new page functionality 2) Rss feed support 3) Embedded html for media inclusion

kindly provide me the instructions to enable them

can someone please help me on how to implement the enhancement features on 1) Open new page functionality 2) Rss feed support 3) Embedded html for media inclusion

Since we have proper starting points for User hub, Sysadmin hub, and Developer hub, why are we maintaining pointless incomplete lists in Manual:Contents as well?

I propose this point to those three sections and that's it.

As I understand, initially this page was understood as the "table of contents" for some virtual book called "technical manual for the MediaWiki software". This should have been the main entry point to the "Manual:" namespace (in these same role as Help:Contents for "Help:" namespace).

If currently this page is completly substituted by Sysadmin hub and Developer hub, then this page may be deleted.

My understanding is that User hub is the entry point to the Help NS, and that the Sysadmin and Dev hubs are entry points to this technical manual (i.e. all pages in the Manual NS).

I think the Manual:Contents should be a complete index to all (top-level) pages in the Manual NS. There seem to be about 600 at the moment (excluding hooks, variables, and filenames). I know the Category:Manual is meant to be that, but it's easier to navigate on a single page.

out of scope

A lot of my colleagues with Microsoft alias are not able to view the pages in wiki despite successful login. What is the reason behind this?

That site has no relation to us. You'll have to contact MS support.