For the canonical overview of the ContentHandler's architecture, see ContentHandler in the MediaWiki code documentation.
For a list of available content handlers, see 内容处理器.
The rationale behind this rather radical change is that being forced to rely on wikitext for all content makes a lot of things quite cumbersome in MediaWiki. The new pluggable architecture for arbitrary types of page content will allow us to hopefully:
- use a different markup language on some or all pages, like tex or markdown.
- store and edit structured configuration data in a more sensible way than e.g. what the Gadgets extension uses on MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition or the LanguageConverter on MediaWiki:Conversiontable*** pages.
- provide data "attachments" to wikitext pages, e.g. for geodata (using a "multipart" content model for the page, similar to the way email attachments are implemented using the multipart message format). (Note: this never materialized, and has now been superseded by Multi-Content Revisions.)
- transition to a system where categories etc are not maintained in the wikitext itself, while still being stored and versioned in the usual way (again, using a multipart content model).
- store structured data for Wikidata easily and natively as page content.
The idea is to store other kinds of data in exactly the same way as wikitext is stored currently, but make MediaWiki aware of the type of content it is dealing with for every page. This way, any kind of data can be used as the content of a wiki page, and it would be stored and versioned exactly as before. To achieve this, the following was implemented in the MediaWiki core:
- keep track of the content model of every page. This is done primarily in the page table in the database (also in the revision and archive tables), and made accessible through the relevant core classes such as
WikiPage. The content model defines the native form of the content, be it a string containing text, a nested structure of arrays, or a PHP object. All operations on the content are performed on its native form.
- keep track of the content format (serialization format) of every revision. This is done primarily in the revision table in the database (also in the archive table, but not in the page table), and made accessible through the relevant core classes such as
Revision. Note that the serialization format is only relevant when loading and storing the revision, no operations are performed on the serialized form of the content.
- Note: in case of flat text content (such as wikitext), the native form of the content is the same as the serialized form (namely, a string). However, conceivably, the native form of wikitext could be some form of AST or DOM in the future.
- Note: the page table records the content model for the current revision, while the revision records the content model and serialization format. Model and format may in theory both change from revision to revision, though this may be confusing, and doesn't allow for meaningful diffs.
This means that all code that needs to perform any operation on the content must be aware of the content's native form. This knowledge is encapsulated using a pluggable framework of handlers, based on two classes:
Contentclass represents the content as such, and provides an interface for all standard operations to be performed on the content's native form. It does not have any knowledge of the page or revision the content belongs to. Content objects are generally, but not necessarily, immutable.
ContentHandlerclass, representing the knowledge about the specifics of a content model without access to concrete Content. Most importantly, instances of ContentHandler act as a factory for Content objects and provide serialization/deserialization. ContentHandler objects are stateless singletons, one for each content model.
The ContentHandler is also used to generate suitable instances of subclasses of
This way, a specialized UI for each content type can easily be plugged in through the ContentHandler interface.
All code that accesses the revision text in any way should be changed to use the methods provided by the Content object instead.
Core classes that provide access the revision text (most importantly,
WikiPage) have been adapted to provide access to the appropriate Content object instead of the text.
The assumption that pages contain wikitext is widespread through the MediaWiki code base. To remain compatible with parts of the code that still assume this, especially with extensions, is thus quite important.
The right way to provide good compatibility is of course not to change public interfaces.
Thus, all methods providing access to the revision content (like
Revision::getText(), etc.) remain in place, and are complemented with an alternative method that allows access to the content object instead (e.g.
The text-based methods are now deprecated, but shall function exactly as before for all pages/revisions that contain wikitext.
This is also true for the action API.
A convenience method,
ContentHandler::getContentText(), is provided to make it easy to retrieve a page's text.
For flat text-based content models such as wikitext (but also JS and CSS),
getContentText() will just return the text, so the old text-based method will return the same as it did before for such revisions.
However, in case a text-based backwards-compatible method is called on a page/revision that does not contain wikitext (or another flat text content model, such a CSS), the behavior depends on the setting of $wgContentHandlerTextFallback: ignore makes it return null, fail causes it to raise an exception, and serialize causes it to return the default serialization of the content.
The default is ignore, which is probably the most conservative option in most scenarios.
For editing however, non-text content is not supported per default.
EditPage and the respective handlers in the action API will fail for non-textual content.
- 如何添加带有扩展名的内容模型： 手册:页面內容模型
- 基本例子： Extension:Markdown
- 内容处理器 — 所有内容模型的列表（包括核心和扩展中的）