Clone a repository from GitLab
edituser@machine:~/src/ $ git clone git@gitlab.wikimedia.org:repos/releng/blubber.git Cloning into 'blubber'... remote: Enumerating objects: 823860, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (823860/823860), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (121686/121686), done. remote: Total 823860 (delta 699470), reused 823820 (delta 699435), pack-reused 0 Receiving objects: 100% (823860/823860), 250.40 MiB
Create a branch
editUse the convention work/{{your username}}/{{topic}}
:
user@machine:~/src/blubber $ git checkout -b work/user/refactor-readme Switched to a new branch 'work/user/refactor-readme'
Make your changes
editWrite some code and save your changes.
Stage and commit your changes
editLet's say you've edited the README.md
in blubber
. You should be able to see this using git status
:
user@machine:~/src/blubber $ git status On branch work/user/refactor-readme Changes to be committed: (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage) modified: README.md
Stage the file and commit, following the commit message guidelines:
user@machine:~/src/blubber $ git add README.md user@machine:~/src/blubber $ git commit -m 'Updated README.md' [work/user/refactor-readme 21c7972d3f8] Updated README.md 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
You should now be able to see this commit in the log:
commit 21c7972d3f819005dc00fa0f3f5cd196c3bb46b4 (HEAD -> work/user/refactor-readme) Author: Some User <user@example.com> Date: Wed Sep 23 15:45:30 2020 -0600 Updated README.md
Fork the repository
editIf you don't have developer-level permissions on the project you'd like to contribute to, you'll first need to copy the repository to your own account. This is known as "forking". Visit the repository page, for example https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/releng/blubber, and click "Fork" in the upper righthand corner.
Now, select your username in the namespace dropdown under "Project URL". You may see a number of options, depending on what other namespaces you have access to. Once that's done, click the "Fork project button".
Next, add a remote for your fork:
user@machine:~/src/blubber $ git remote add fork git@gitlab.wikimedia.org:user/blubber.git
If you've done this successfully, it should show up in your remotes:
# Check remotes: user@machine:~/src/blubber $ git remote -v fork git@gitlab.wikimedia.org:user/blubber.git (fetch) fork git@gitlab.wikimedia.org:user/blubber.git (push) origin git@gitlab.wikimedia.org:repos/releng/blubber.git (fetch) origin git@gitlab.wikimedia.org:repos/releng/blubber.git (push)
Push your commit to GitLab
editIf you have commit access, you can push directly to a branch on the origin with git push origin work/user/refactor-readme
.
If you're using a fork, push instead to the remote you added above with git push fork work/user/refactor-readme
.
user@machine:~/src/blubber $ git push origin work/user/refactor-readme Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Delta compression using up to 20 threads Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 352 bytes | 176.00 KiB/s, done. Total 3 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: remote: ======================================================================== remote: remote: 🚧 This instance is [under remote: construction](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/GitLab/Roadmap); remote: expect occasional downtime. Runners available in /repos. Questions? remote: Ask in [#wikimedia-gitlab on remote: libera.chat](https://web.libera.chat/?channel=#wikimedia-gitlab), remote: or under remote: [GitLab](https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/board/5057/) on remote: Phabricator. remote: remote: ======================================================================== remote: remote: To create a merge request for work/user/refactor-readme, visit: remote: https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/releng/blubber/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=work%2Fuser%2Frefactor-readme remote: To gitlab.mediawiki.org:repos/releng/blubber.git * [new branch] work/user/refactor-readme -> work/user/refactor-readme
Create a merge request on GitLab
editYou may notice that GitLab responded to the push with a link to create a new merge request from your branch. You can follow that link directly, or visit the GitLab instance, navigate to the branch list for the repository, and click the "Merge request" button in the listing.
Provide an informative title and description for the merge request, and @-mention the users you'd like to see review your code. You should be able to use the full range of syntax in GitLab Markdown.
Merge options
editIn the "Merge options" section:
- Check "Delete source branch when merge request is accepted" to avoid cluttering the repository with already-merged feature branches. (This is probably the default.)
- In the general case, you should use "Squash commits when merge request is accepted". (This is probably the default.)
- Omit this if you plan to submit a merge request containing multiple commits.
- If the logical structure of your change dictates multiple commits, you may use interactive rebase to achieve the desired history and force push to your work branch before merge. This is an advanced workflow, but supported.
- Check "Allow commits from members who can merge to the target branch", unless you have a specific reason to prevent others from making changes.
Draft / WIP merge requests
editIf you want to let reviewers know that your change is a work in progress and prevent accidental merges, you can use a draft merge request. Prefix your merge request title with Draft:
. This will display a notice and disable "merge" button for reviewers.
Adding commits to a merge request
editMaking new commits
editTypically, you'll just make a new commit on your work branch, as usual, and push to the correct remote:
git push origin work/user/refactor-readme
Or:
git push fork work/user/refactor-readme
The new commit makes it very easy for reviewers to see what changed since they last saw the merge request, and will be squashed into the other commits when the pull request is merged, assuming that the pull request is set up to squash commits on merge (as recommended above).
Force pushing to a branch
editIf, instead, you wish to rewrite the history of the branch, for example by altering an existing commit or rebasing your work on top of upstream changes, GitLab allows force-pushing to a branch that's associated with a merge request. With this approach it is still very easy for reviewers to see what changed since the last push to the merge request.
user@machine:~/src/blubber $ git status On branch work/user/refactor-readme Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) modified: README.md no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a") # Add your changed file: user@machine:~/src/blubber $ git add README.md # Amend the previous commit: user@machine:~/src/blubber $ git commit --amend [work/user/refactor-readme b867605eb86] README.md: Add some whitespace and rework lists Date: Fri Sep 25 14:29:44 2020 -0600 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) # Push to your remote: user@machine:~/src/blubber $ git push -f fork work/user/refactor-readme Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Delta compression using up to 20 threads Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 403 bytes | 403.00 KiB/s, done. Total 3 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: remote: ======================================================================== remote: remote: 🚧 This instance is [under remote: construction](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/GitLab/Roadmap); remote: expect occasional downtime. Runners available in /repos. Questions? remote: Ask in [#wikimedia-gitlab on remote: libera.chat](https://web.libera.chat/?channel=#wikimedia-gitlab), remote: or under remote: [GitLab](https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/board/5057/) on remote: Phabricator. remote: remote: ======================================================================== remote: remote: To create a merge request for work/user/refactor-readme, visit: remote: https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/user/blubber/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=work%2Fuser%2Frefactor-readme remote: To https://gitlab.wikimedia.org:brennen/blubber.git + 4b860bb6680...b867605eb86 work/user/refactor-readme -> work/user/refactor-readme (forced update)
This is mainly suitable for merge requests which are not meant to be squashed on merge, typically because they contain two or more commits that should remain separate. In that case, you clean up the history locally and then force-push it to update the merge request.
Getting code review
editOnce you've submitted a merge request, someone will need to review it. In addition to @-mentioning appropriate users in your merge request description or comments, you can assign a single reviewer. Do this by clicking "Edit" next to "Reviewers" in the sidebar at the right side of the page when viewing a merge request.
You may also use "Assignee" to indicate ownership of the merge request, responsibility for merging, etc., as useful to your workflow.
Please see Code review for documentation on reviewing code.
Local repository migration
editUpdate your remote
editWhen we migrate from Gerrit to GitLab you will need to update your remote repository url locally:
$ git remote set-url origin git@gitlab.wikimedia.org:[repo-name].git # or $ git remote set-url origin https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/[repo-name].git
Rename "master" to "main"
editAs part of the migration to GitLab, we are changing the mainline branch from master
to main
.
To update your local checkout (after changing your remote):
# Rename the branch locally $ git branch -m master main # Reset your upstream branch $ git fetch $ git branch --unset-upstream $ git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/main # Change the remote head $ git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD refs/remotes/origin/main
This transition is documented on Phabricator on phab:T281593 (and phab:T254646).
Sources and further reading
editThere's a lot of quality documentation available for GitLab, although navigating it can be a bit tricky.
- Contributors to the talk page for the GitLab consultation have reported on various workflow experiments.
- GitLab User Docs
- KDE's GitLab documentation - we're borrowing the convention of work branches from this, and it's a well-written document overall.
- This document is inspired by Gerrit/Tutorial.
- GitLab/Gerrit to GitLab documents how features and concepts map between systems.