編集チェック/偽陽性
編集チェック は、編集中にウィキペディアのポリシーに関する実用的なフィードバックを提供するために開発された機能です。最初のイテレーションは、新しい情報を記事に公開する前に編集者にインライン引用を追加するよう促すプロンプトで構成されます。
編集チェックとは?
すべての編集は タグ付き です。他のチェックのために アイデアを提案 することができます。
編集チェックの改善にご協力ください
報告ログ
Spoorthi Rao
- Page and diff
- Please link to the page where the check was shown, and the diff if you can. https://kn.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B2%AC%E0%B2%BF%E0%B2%97%E0%B3%8D_%E0%B2%AC%E0%B2%BE%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%8D_%E0%B2%95%E0%B2%A8%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%A8%E0%B2%A1_(%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%80%E0%B2%B8%E0%B2%A8%E0%B3%8D_11)
- Check shown
- Please list the Edit Check tags you see associated with the edit you are reporting. [1] [2]
- Description
- Please describe why you do not think Edit Check should have been activated for this edit.
Spoorthi Rao (talk) 04:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC) Above mentioned user is citing his or her personal opinion and destroying article's credibility.
- Hello @Spoorthi Rao
- Thank you for reporting this.
- After investigation, the activation of Edit check (see here how it looks) was accurate.
- It also appears that the user you mentioned would have had changed the article no matter what. When the request to add a reference was shown, the added a random website instead of declining the request.
- Hope this helps; if you have any question, let me know! Trizek_(WMF) (talk) 14:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Strainu
- Page and diff
- https://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Florica_Prevenda&curid=2298559&diff=16648598&oldid=15782574
- Check shown
- Edit Check (references) activated, Edit Check (referințe) respins (incert)
- Description
- The edit contains sources. Not sure if they were added after the prompt, but either way, it's confusing to have the rejected tag
Strainu (talk) 08:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Another diff, same situation. Strainu (talk) 10:59, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Strainu Hello, technically the Edit Check detects every paragraphs to see if it contains any citations or not. As far as I can see, there are paragraphs that do not contain any sources in the provided diff, so it is not a false positive. Do you have any opinions or suggestions? Thanks. SCP-2000 (talk) 04:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification @SCP-2000. Does the limit of characters from MediaWiki:Editcheck-config.json also applies per paragraph or overall? E.g. if I add 50 characters in one paragraph and 51 in the second with a limit of 100 characters, will EdiitCheck be triggered? Strainu (talk) 08:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Strainu: It is per paragraph. SCP-2000 (talk) 12:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification @SCP-2000. Does the limit of characters from MediaWiki:Editcheck-config.json also applies per paragraph or overall? E.g. if I add 50 characters in one paragraph and 51 in the second with a limit of 100 characters, will EdiitCheck be triggered? Strainu (talk) 08:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Strainu Hello, technically the Edit Check detects every paragraphs to see if it contains any citations or not. As far as I can see, there are paragraphs that do not contain any sources in the provided diff, so it is not a false positive. Do you have any opinions or suggestions? Thanks. SCP-2000 (talk) 04:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)