Architecture decision record template
This page is obsolete. It is being retained for archival purposes. It may document extensions or features that are obsolete and/or no longer supported. Do not rely on any information on this page. |
The title of an architecture decision record (ADR) should be prefixed with "ADR". For example: ADR Architecture decision-making process
Status: Draft/Proposed/Accepted/Deprecated/Superseded
Problem statement edit
This page is obsolete. It is being retained for archival purposes. It may document extensions or features that are obsolete and/or no longer supported. Do not rely on any information on this page. |
Terminology edit
Define the terms you'll use in this statement
What? edit
What is the problem or opportunity? What does it look like if we made this decision and executed on it?
Why? edit
Why is this valuable? What organizational objective does this support? And how? What if we do nothing?
Who? edit
Can you calculate the RACI? Who is working on the project directly? Who is maintaining a product or code which will be impacted?
Who has an operational responsibility which will be impacted?
- Responsible
- Who is doing the work?
- Accountable
- Who is overseeing the work?
- Consulted
- Who do you need to talk to and why? How do they intersect with this problem or opportunity? Why consulted? What is the level of impact?
- Informed
- For example, program managers/project with dependencies on this work
When? edit
What is the timeframe for making this decision. Are there already known milestones?
Unresolved questions edit
Specific questions that would need to be answered during this decision process
Resources edit
Any other reading or links
System model edit
This can include components, layers, personas, links to capability models, or any other artifacts needed to capture the current architecture
Stakeholder advice edit
After asking any clarifying questions, each team or party identified as a stakeholder adds their advice here
Team name edit
Team name edit
Proposals edit
A description of at least three options that fulfill the requirements, including a model of the proposed architecture
Option 1: Description edit
Option 2: Description edit
Option 3: Description edit
Decision edit
Which proposal was selected and why
Consequences edit
The context resulting from the decision, including positive, negative, and neutral consequences
Retrospective edit
If a retrospective is held, add notes here