Architecture committee/2016-06-15

Agenda timeline edit

Intro
- Agenda bashing and action item check 21:00 (5 minutes)
- Review last week's RfC office hour 21:05 (5 minutes)
RFC status update
- RfC inbox triage 21:10 (10 minutes)
- Shepherd assignments 21:20 (5 minutes)
- Queue for future RfC office hours 21:25 (5 minutes)
Wrapup
- Other business 21:30 (10 minutes)
- Next week’s ArchCom agenda 21:40 (10 minutes)

Agenda details/Meeting summary edit

This section equates to the "meeting summary" section in the meeting note template. It's collaboratively edited during the meeting and serves as the official public notes of the meeting. Attendees: Fill in the important details in this section, but try to keep this concise and NPOV (easy way: use questions). Put any prep information in this section if appropriate

Intro section edit

10 minutes (starting 21:00 UTC)

Action items
- Last week (Architecture committee/2016-06-08)
  - RobLa: make proposal "Backlog" column (not done, but now tracked as T137860)
Review last week’s RfC office hour
- Phab:E203
  - T89331: Replace Tidy in MW parser with HTML 5 parse/reserialize
    - Discussion about migration strategy

RFC status update edit

Ensuring Architecture committee/Status is up-to-date:

Today’s IRC topic: T120452: Allow tabular datasets on Commons (or some similar central repository) (CSV, TSV, JSON, XML) (See also: comments in T124569 and T134426)
- Brion points out two questions
  - Tech issues of “is this acceptable? e.g. queries from Lua?”
  - Which site?
    - is this in the jurisdiction of ArchCom?
    - how should we define the scope? what will be the relationship with Wikidata?
Who is chairing the upcoming IRC meeting? RobLa
Conclude last week's "final comment period"? Do we have anything that should enter "final comment"? Nope
Do we have an RFC selected for next week's meeting?
- Going to Wikimania?
  - Yes: Daniel, Timo
  - No: Brion, Kevin, Tim, RobLa
  - Unknown: Roan, Gabriel
For each upcoming meeting, do we anticipate the RFC moving into "final comment"? Nope
How does ArchCom-RfCs board look?
- Where should anything in the inbox go?
Roundtable:
- Daniel
  - Search on Wikidata; pushback on everything else
  - Site refactoring is on my mind
  - Wishlist to work on: Multi-content revisions, will work with Brion in July on this
  - Wishlist: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T114640
- Timo

Keeping track of CSP header RFC
Busy with perf refactoring ResourceLoader
Wishlist: RFC driven frontend (will talk with Gabriel)

- Brion
  - Try to push some more on multi-content revisions
    - Plan a work sprint with Daniel in first week of July
  - Going through backlog
  - Write up RFCs for native SVG, adaptive-streaming video storage, a few other things
- Tim
  - Balanced templates RFC will be coming around. Scott wrapping up implementation
  - Last week’s RFC
- RobLa
  - Security
  - Discussing T112999
    - Tim: maybe the thing after Parsoid
    - -> various future-proofing issues of HTML format need to be worked out for the day when you can’t just regen everything from the wikitext
- Not present: Roan, Gabriel
Next week?
- Topic
  - What do you all consider important?
  - MediaWiki support for Markdown? Parsoid model for Markdown?
  - ACTION: send out RFC (or at least email) about this topic
  - T137926 require curl extension for PHP?
What is the most important thing each ArchCom member is shepherding? Anything blocked? Are responsibilities balanced well?

Other business/planning edit

20 minutes (starting 21:30 UTC)

Is it time to look at the #ArchCom board more seriously?
Next week's ArchCom

generated from Architecture committee/MeetingNoteTemplate