Analytics/Roadmap/PlanningMeetings/AnalyticsReboot
Purpose
editRational Aim: To align analytics customers, stakeholders, and practitioners around the needs for Wikimedia Foundation to make better decisions through data
Experiential Aim: To demonstrate a collaborative, cross-functional model of how WMF staff can develop the vision of analytics
Participants
edit- Anasuya Sengupta
- Andrew Otto
- Dan Andreescu
- David Schoonover
- Diederik Van Liere
- Erik Moeller
- Erik Zachte
- Frank Schulenburg
- Gayle Young
- Howie Fung
- Jessie Wild
- Kraig Parkinson
- Rob Lanphier
- Stefan Petrea
Process
editProposed Agenda
edit- Introduction
- Understanding our Current Capability
- Review Stakeholder Feedback
- Showcase & Feedback of Analytics Offerings
- Setting up an Innovation Pipeline
- Defining an Operating Model for Analytics
- Moving from Analytics Platform to Analytics-Enabled Leadership
- Ecosystem Map
- Value Proposition Canvas
- Service Blueprinting
- Making Change Happen
- Four-Tables Contextualization
- Action Mapping
- Charrettes: Safe-Fail Experiments & Ritual Dissent
- Resourcing Considerations
Actual Agenda
edit- Introduction
- Understanding our Current Capability
- Review Stakeholder Feedback
- Showcase & Feedback of Analytics Offerings
- Setting up an Innovation Pipeline
- Defining an Operating Model for Analytics
- Moving from Analytics Platform to Analytics-Enabled Leadership
- Ecosystem Map
- Value Proposition Canvas
Service Blueprinting
- Making Change Happen
Four-Tables ContextualizationAction MappingCharrettes: Safe-Fail Experiments & Ritual DissentResourcing Considerations- Discuss Next Actions
Issues
edit- Differences in opinion about how analytics works at WMF and how it compares to Analytics Lifecycle presented by Ken Collier.
- Challenges learning the Operating Model framework as planned. Had to coach groups through how to use it.
- Divergent thinking with respect to how to organize analytics. Could be due to previous issue.
- Difficult to keep some remote team members engaged, in part due to A/V issues
Meeting Notes & Artifacts
edit- FIX: missing
Product/Next Steps
edit- Setup scheme for prioritization and scheduling of features.
- Considering leveling capacity by stakeholder group (scheduling work along fixed sequence, fixed time)
- Schedule day-to-day work based on classes of service to support day-to-day responsiveness
- Review monthly
- Setup routine for investigating opportunities to improve analytics capabilities
- Identifying needs
- Exploring potential solutions
- Validating ideas with stakeholders and customers
- Develop a value path toward initial base cluster and share widely with stakeholders
- Follow up with analysts to elicit workflow of analytical model development and analysis
- Work with individual stakeholder groups to determine upcoming analytics needs