Wikibase/Indexing/Benchmarks

Titan benchmarks edit

Made on einsteinium with external cassandra cluster.

Shorter lookups edit

These are short lookups that must be fast.

Checking random element without fetching property edit

w.measure(10000) { def a = g.V('wikibaseId','Q'+(random.nextInt(10000000) as String)).hasNext(); }

[18816, 13342, 15188, 12626, 12289]

Average: 14452.2

Time: 1.44522 ms

Checking random element edit

w.benchmark { 10000.times { def a = g.V('wikibaseId','Q'+(random.nextInt(10000000) as String)).labelEn.hasNext(); } }

[39330, 28555, 30037, 27755, 35049]

Average: 32145.2

Time: 3.21452 ms

Checking fixed node edit

This mostly measured cache performance.

w.measure(10000) { a = g.V('wikibaseId', 'Q30').labelEn.hasNext() }

[10889, 9779, 8969, 8930, 9467]

Average: 9606.8

Time: 0.9ms

Checking supernode edit

This mostly measured cache performance, but for supernode that has tons of incoming edges.

w.measure(10000)  { def a = g.V('wikibaseId', 'Q5').labelEn.next(); } 

[9611, 8339, 8174, 8360, 8815]

Average: 8659.8

Time: 0.8ms

Checking supernode out - first human edit

Navigating "wide" link out of supernode.

w.measure(100) { def a = g.V('wikibaseId', 'Q5').in("P31")[0].next(); }

[8689, 7015, 7194, 8082, 8515]

Average: 7899

Time: 0.7899 ms

Random human edit

This may stretch the cache a little more, but still be cacheable.

w.measure(10000) { def a = g.V('wikibaseId', 'Q5').in("P31")[random.nextInt(10000)].next(); }

[21395, 21192, 21288, 20017, 21699]

Average: 21118.2

Time: 2.11182 ms

Random human with name, bigger spread edit

This is probably outside of current cache size. Also, [] probably does linear scan, so it behaves worse quadratically, as expected.

w.measure(100) { def a = g.V('wikibaseId', 'Q5').in("P31")[random.nextInt(100000)].labelEn.next(); }

[27543, 24389, 24191, 23185, 26852]

Average: 25232

Time: 252.32 ms

Random human with name - cached edit

def a = g.listOf('Q5')[0].next()

Check if random entry is a human - non-cached edit

This is using "out" link to Q5.

w.measure(1000) { def a = g.V('wikibaseId', 'Q'+(random.nextInt(10000000) as String)).out("P31").has('wikibaseId', 'Q5').hasNext(); }

[6509, 3882, 4626, 4165, 3371]

Average: 4510.6

Time: 4.5106 ms

Check if random entry is a human - cached edit

This uses "link" property on the vertex itself. Surprisingly, not much difference! 

w.measure(10000) { def a = g.V('wikibaseId', 'Q'+(random.nextInt(10000000) as String)).has('P31link', CONTAINS, 'Q5').hasNext(); }

[54131, 52634, 43485, 41180, 44011]

Average: 47088.2

Time: 4.70882 ms

Check if random entry is human and not disambiguation edit

Simplistic approach - just go by out links w.measure(1000) { def a = g.V('wikibaseId', 'Q'+(random.nextInt(10000000) as String)).as('x').out("P31").has('wikibaseId', 'Q5').back('x').filter{!it.out('P31').has('wikibaseId', 'Q4167410').hasNext()}.hasNext(); } [9069, 7610, 5076, 4825, 6499]

Average: 6615.8

Time: 6.6158 ms

More sophisticated condition handling using link property: w.measure(1000) { def a = g.V('wikibaseId', 'Q'+(random.nextInt(10000000) as String)).filter{'Q5' in it.P31link && !('Q4167410' in it.P31link);}.hasNext(); } [4489, 3696, 3677, 3597, 3480]

Average: 3787.8

Time: 3.7878 ms

Collect 1000 non-empty names edit

Using link property:

w.measure(1000) {t = []; g.V('P31link', 'Q5').labelEn.filter{it != null}[0..1000].aggregate(t).iterate(); assert t.size() == 1001;}

[29682, 29685, 31022, 30879, 28966]

Average: 30046.8

Time: 30.0468 ms

Using "in" edge. Now there's a big difference:

w.measure(100) {t = []; g.V('wikibaseId', 'Q5').in('P31').labelEn.filter{it != null}[0..1000].aggregate(t).iterate(); assert t.size() == 1001;}

[13203, 11387, 11429, 11385, 11359]

Average: 11752.6

Time: 117.526 ms

Find country edit

This would be heavily cached.

w.measure(1000) { def a = g.V('wikibaseId', 'Q1013639').toCountry().labelEn.next(); }

[2905, 2625, 2504, 2358, 2436]

Average: 2565.6

Time: 2.5656 ms

Find country of random neighborhood edit

This one may have less luck with caching.

w.measure(100) { def a = g.listOf('Q123705').shuffle()[0].toCountry().labelEn.hasNext(); }

[17432, 17212, 16752, 16681, 16310]

Average: 16877.4

Time: 168.774 ms

Check if random neighborhood is in Finland? edit

w.measure(100) { g.listOf('Q123705').shuffle()[0].toCountry().has('wikibaseId', 'Q33').hasNext(); }

[17707, 17807, 17310, 17461, 18288]

Average: 17714.6

Time: 177.146 ms

Longer list queries edit

These may generate long lists and are expected to be slower.

List of countries by population edit

The list is small, so most probably it's cacheable.

w.measure(100) { t= []; g.listOf('Q6256').as('c').groupBy{it}{it.claimValues('P1082').preferred().latest()}.cap.scatter.filter{it.value.size()>0}.transform{it.value = it.value.P1082value.collect{it?it as int:0}.max(); it}.order{it.b.value <=> it.a.value}.transform{[it.key.wikibaseId, it.key.labelEn, it.value]}.aggregate(t).iterate(); } 

[2885, 2838, 2811, 2803, 2776]

Average: 2822.6

Time: 28.226 ms

List of all occupations edit

Probably caches too.

w.measure(100) { t = []; g.wd('Q28640').treeIn('P279').instances().dedup().aggregate(t).iterate(); assert t.size() == 2777}

[4647, 4530, 4593, 4549, 4479]

Average: 4559.6

Time: 45.596 ms

List of potential nationalities edit

WDQ produces 571815 results.

g.listOf('Q5').as('humans').claimValues('P569').filter{it.P569value != 'somevalue' && it.P569value > Date.parse('yyyy', '1750')}
   .back('humans').claimVertices('P19').toCountry().as('countries').select(['humans', 'countries']){it.labelEn}{it.labelEn}

List of humans having occupation writer but not author edit

This one has 36K+ entries, takes a lot of time. Maybe there's more optimal way to write the same query.

w.benchmark { g.V.has('P106link', 'Q36180').filter{'Q5' in it.P31link && !('Q482980' in it.P106link)}.dump("authors", "wikibaseId", "labelEn") }
 
 w.benchmark { t = []; g.V.has('P106link', 'Q36180').as('w').has('P106link', 'Q482980').aggregate(t).optional('w').except(t).dump("authors", "wikibaseId", "labelEn") }
 

86.017s

List of humans with no date of death edit

WDQ produces 14431 results.

w.benchmark { g.listOf('Q5').as('humans').claimValues('P569').filter{it.P569value && it.P569value < Date.parse('yyyy', '1880')}.back('humans').filter{!it.out('P570').hasNext()}.dump("undead", "wikibaseId", "labelEn"); }

4763.817 s

too slow, probably needs value index.